| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
* Calling Timer::setTimeout() from within Timer::start() might lead to ugly
behavior (as experienced in bugs #3590078, #3600143, etc; see commit
4d307dcd10af9d817ff5c05fc40ae7487564cb31, fixes the problem partially).
* Stop a timer first, then call the handler (via Timer::fireTimeout()). A
given handler might call Timer::start() again, which (re)adds the Timer
to the control list .. the following Timer::stop() would remove it again.
* Use 'm_start' as indicator if timer is running.
* Move the (now quite short) code of ::addTimer / ::removeTimer
into the Timer::start() and Timer::stop() functions.
|
|
|
|
With commit 541c8c4 we switched from an (manually) ordered list to a
std::set<> to handle the active timers. The code which checks for overdue
timers now traverses and modifies the std::set<> in place. This might
lead to an infinite loop. Examples of such bad behavior are "flickering of
the tooltip" (bug #3590078) or crashes (bug #3600143) or just insanely high
cpu load when autoraising windows or submenus.
We now make a copy of the std::set<> traverse this instead of the original.
|
|
|
|
|
|
timer list
Setting a new timeout on a running FbTk::Timer must remove it from the timerlist,
otherwise the list is not ordered correctly anymore. So, we stop the running
FbTk::Timer, set the new timeout and restart it.
|
|
gettimeofday() is subject to be changed on daylight-saving or to ntp-related
(think leap-seconds). even worse, it is subject to be changed BACK in time. this
is hard to fix correctly (see commit 45726d3016e and bug #3560509). it is
irrelevant for timers to know the nano-seconds since the epoch anyways.
|
|
Found with cppcheck:
"Prefix ++/-- operators should be preferred for non-primitive
types. Pre-increment/decrement can be more efficient than
post-increment/decrement. Post-increment/decrement usually
involves keeping a copy of the previous value around and adds
a little extra code."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the previous version of operator*() made no sense. E.g., it violated the invariant
(*ptr).foo <=> ptr->foo. The dereferencing operator now returns a reference to the pointed-to
object, rather than a pointer to it.
I also added a bool conversion operator, which can be used in testing the NULL-ness of the
pointer. Anyone wondering if that could be done in a simpler way is encouraged to read
<http://www.artima.com/cppsource/safebool.html>.
And, finally, I removed the mutable flag from the m_data member, since it does not need it.
|
|
|
|
#2997117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ObjectRegistry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
solution: add the delta to all of our timers too.
|
|
actually we must ensure that only timers with a valid handle are added to the
timerslist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
